Bannerbild | zur StartseiteBannerbild | zur StartseiteBannerbild | zur StartseiteBannerbild | zur StartseiteBannerbild | zur Startseite
 

Namibia: Community-based natural resource management protects natural areas

In former times, when farmers had few rights to use wildlife, wild animals were seen as little more than a threat to livestock, crops and infrastructure, as well as community safety. Thus, conservation management took place within protected areas only. In 1967 the commercial rights over wildlife and indigenous plants were given to Namibia’s commercial farmers. The implementation of these rights resulted in wildlife being utilised and valued (“What pays that stays”) by the private sector. People in communal areas received the same rights much later (1996-2001) when policies were adopted to promote community-based natural resource management (CBNRM). Since then the wildlife sector was also driven into a rapid growth on communal land.

 

In addition to community-based tourism, a large number of commercial farmers established free-hold conservancies and tourism enterprises on private lands, too.

 

In contrast to community-based tourism, commercial conservancies are not supported by the government in any way. Thus, they need to function self-sufficient from the first day. Two well-established examples are the N/a’an ku sê Foundation and NamibRand Nature Reserve – see websites below. The latter one belongs to the Long Run Initiative.

 

Why is this case a good example of linking tourism and conservation?

Are there plans to further improve this example of tourism supporting conservation in the future?

How could this example be transferred to another protected area and knowledge be shared?