The Great Bear Rainforest
Greenpeace video – After almost two decades of conflict and then collaboration, a unique partnership of First Nations governments and the British Columbia government along with environmental groups and forestry companies have come to a final long-term agreement on how to safeguard the beautiful Great Bear Rainforest on Canada’s west coast. Indigenous cultural and ecotourism is playing a major role in the new conservation economy of the Great Bear Rainforest.
The Great Bear Rainforest is the largest tract of intact coastal temperate rainforest left on Earth (6.4 million hectares: about the size of Ireland), situated on the central and north coast of the Province of British Columbia on Canada’s west coast. With as many as 100 unlogged large valley systems the Great Bear Rainforest (GBR) supports tremendous biodiversity including grizzly bears, black bears, the rare white spirit bears, unique fisher wolf populations, six million migratory birds, three thousand genetically distinct salmon stocks, and a multitude of unique botanical resources. This region sustains 20% of the world’s remaining wild salmon.
Prince Rupert the port city (population 22,000) at the north end of the GBRF serves as the road, air and water transportation hub for the north coast. The majority of the communities situated within the GBRF are small, isolated communities accessible only by air or water. This region and the adjacent archipelago of Haida Gwaii are the unceded traditional territories of 27 coastal First Nations.
For generations, the First Nations have relied on their knowledge of seasonal cycles of the abundant nature to sustainably harvest a wide variety of resources. They were the responsible stewards over their traditional territories and resources, and they maintained their right to govern, to make and enforce laws, to decide citizenship and to manage their lands, resources and institutions.
In the 1800s non-Indigenous people began arriving in the Great Bear Rainforest and Haida Gwaii. In addition to other significant harms caused by colonization, they looked to log the vast tracts of forest and fish the abundant salmon runs. Throughout much of the last century, pulp mills, sawmills, logging camps, canneries, and mines extracted resources from First Nations’ traditional territories despite their protests. The First Nation inhabitants gained few benefits from the early resource extraction and they suffered extensive economic, social and cultural damage.
By the 1990s the region’s economy had dwindled to isolated logging camps, a much-reduced fishing fleet, and a handful of tourist lodges scattered through the region. Most of the First Nations were suffering from high unemployment and low graduation rates, limited infrastructures, poor access to healthcare, substandard housing, and low incomes.
In the 1980s and early 90s conflict in British Columbia’s rainforests erupted as public concern heightened over the clear cut logging methods. On Haida Gwaii, Elders and youth stood side by side with environmental groups to block the logging trucks and protect large portions of Haida Gwaii (meaning ‘islands of the people’ to the local Haida people). Environmental activists followed the Haida lead, fighting to protect the remaining 13 intact watersheds on Vancouver Island, culminating in 1993 when over 900 people were arrested trying to prevent logging in Clayoquot Sound. It was the largest mass arrest in Canadian history.
Most of BC’s land base is publicly owned, with a great deal of it on Indigenous lands with unresolved Rights and Title, and 95% of BC’s commercial forests are found on public land. In 2000, leaders from First Nations communities throughout the Great Bear Rainforest came together to restore and implement responsible and sustainable land, water, and resource management approaches on the Central and North Coast of British Columbia, and on the outlying archipelago of Haida Gwaii. First Nations wanted to promote economic development on the coast while at the same time protecting the environment and quality of life of those who lived there.
A unique alliance was formed between nine of the First Nations, called the Coastal First Nations (Great Bear Initiative Society). The goal of this group is to restore and implement ecologically, socially, and economically sustainable resource management approaches on the Central and North Coast and Haida Gwaii. In the southern end of the GBRF the Na̲nwak̲olas Council represents five First Nations. These Nations together hold stewardship of Aweenak’ola, which means “ the lands we are on”, with their traditional areas on North Vancouver Island and the mainland coast opposite. These two groups have been instrumental in protecting the GBRF region.
In February 2016, the Government of B.C., First Nations, environmental groups, and forest industry representatives announced the final decision on how the Great Bear Rainforest would be managed in 2016 and into the future. The approach is Ecosystem-Based Management (EBM) an approach based in science as well as traditional, local knowledge. Ecosystem-based management in the area is defined as “concurrent achievement of high levels of ecological integrity and high levels of human well-being.”
The agreement has two goals:
To achieve ecological integrity of the forests (based on best available science);
To achieve high levels of Human Well Being in the region.
The 2016 Great Bear Rainforest Land Use Order and Great Bear Rainforest (Forest Management) Act will conserve 85% of the forest and 70% of old growth over time, achieving a high level of ecological integrity. The Order and Act have also resulted in the following achievements:
Protection of 5 million acres;
Ecosystem-Based Management to reach science-based conservation targets;
$120 million in Conservation Financing for the First Nations to utilize for conservation-based economic development and for conservation management of their territories ($60 million raised by the environmental sector from US and Canadian philanthropists and $60 million matching funds leveraged from the federal and provincial governments);
New land management agreements between First Nations and the province through a “Government to Government” relationship;
The Province signed reconciliation protocols with the Coastal First Nations and the Nanwakolas Council. Through these government-to-government relationships, separate human well-being agreements have been reached to address issues of special concern to each group of First Nations. Most notably, both have an increased stake in the forest sector;
Additionally, the Province committed to amending atmospheric benefit-sharing agreements with Nanwakolas and Coastal First Nations. This will increase the forest carbon credits First Nations can use to support the implementation of ecosystem-based management and community development projects of importance; and
The land-use order also addresses First Nations’ cultural heritage resources, freshwater ecosystems and wildlife habitat.
The following are a selection of tourism initiatives supported through available conservation financing capital in the GBRF that clearly illustrate the connection between tourism and conservation:
Why is this case a good example of linking tourism and conservation?
How could this example be transferred to another protected area and knowledge be shared?
Are there plans to further improve this example of tourism supporting conservation in the future?






